Search for: "Hodges v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Hodges, 135 S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Buhman1 from the United States (947 F. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed and Lord… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
Hodges mandated that all state governments recognize gay marriage. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 3:44 pm
Hodges and Windsor v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm
Hodges, (September 28, 2016).Iain T. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:40 am
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
In Holt v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:15 am
’s foundational premise of heterosexual parenting and nonrecognition of same-sex couples is unsustainable, particularly in light of the enactment of same-sex marriage in New York State, and the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v Hodges (576 US __, 135 S Ct 2584 [2015]), which noted that the right to marry provides benefits not only for same-sex couples, but also the children being raised by those couples. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Hodges). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:24 pm
At the conference, he delivered a presentation entitled “LGBT Employment Discrimination in the United States post-Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
Hodges: One year ago, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
