Search for: "Hodges v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 10:23 am by David Oscar Markus
Hodges, the 2015 decision that recognized the right to same-sex marriage, or of organizations trying to revisit Griswold v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence "Hearing Ordered Into Audibility of Recording Offered as Proof of Bribes' Acceptance" United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
Hodges, Arkansas may treat married same-sex couples differently. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:05 pm
United States . . .; United States v. [read post]
  Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:55 am by Mark Graber
  How constitutional theory lost touch with central problems of American governance is worthy of some thought.The contemporary constitutionalism canon in the United States has three prongs. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Hodges doesn’t require the state to list both married same-sex parents on their child’s birth certificate,” although “[s]tate law requires that both married opposite-sex parents be listed. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by Robert Epstein
  One has to wonder whether the party arguing in favor of the existence of a cohabitation agreement in that case would have tried to make such a stretch after the United States Supreme Court ruling of Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Hodges, which protects the right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]