Search for: "Hodges v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Hodges doesn’t require the state to list both married same-sex parents on their child’s birth certificate,” although “[s]tate law requires that both married opposite-sex parents be listed. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by Robert Epstein
  One has to wonder whether the party arguing in favor of the existence of a cohabitation agreement in that case would have tried to make such a stretch after the United States Supreme Court ruling of Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Hodges, which protects the right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am by Jordan Brunner
Federal Republic of Ethiopia that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act gives state-sponsored hackers immunity, while Emma Kohse discussed the history and current state of the ATS suit Salim v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Hodges decision this past June, there has been very little discussion of what happens to civil unions and those who are united in civil unions. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Hodges decision this past June, there has been very little discussion of what happens to civil unions and those who are united in civil unions. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:20 pm by Linda McClain
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this declaration in her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]