Search for: "Hodges v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
(d) In accordance with the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am by Florian Mueller
Howard: "Being completely non-technical it relates to the same invention, but the fact that it relates to the same invention does not lead to the conclusion that the patent of that invention in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and China is valid. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 11:29 am by Ginzburg & Bronshteyn, APC
The United States and California constitutions protect marriage as a fundamental right. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  The trial is listed for 3 days On 11 November 2019 there will be a trial in the case of Turley v Unite the Union The claimant is the MP for Redcar. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hodges—where the state was denying demographic class of people the ability to marry. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Lord Hodge asks Lord Keen QC how Parliament is to respond if it is not there. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
We have had a long debate in the United States about who can marry whom. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury has awarded bakery owner David Gibson damages of $11 million against Oberlin College which had accused Gibsons Bakery of having a history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Hodges, he excoriated at length the Lochner decision itself, its activist embrace of “courts . . . substitut[ing] their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies . . . [read post]