Search for: "Hoffman v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2012, 5:51 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court of Appeals relied heavily on two 1980’s Supreme Court decisions, United States Parole Commission v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  To construe “these four puzzling opinions that have few common aspects,” Tyree employed the analysis for such situations adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Marks v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
 Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:03 am
Hoffman, Texas Rules of Evidence Handbook, art. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:36 am by Larry Catá Backer
Significant in this respect are the current United Nations sponsored efforts to “operationalize” a regulatory framework imposing a direct obligation on multinational corporations to respect human rights. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
  The judgment reiterates the oft-repeated words of Lord Hoffman in Kirin-Amgen [2005] RPC 9: “The courts of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany certainly discourage, if they do not actually prohibit, use of the patent office file in aid of construction. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]