Search for: "Hoge v. Hoge"
Results 1 - 20
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 3:28 am
Supreme Court: Vitra v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
Professor Jessica Litman has a fascinating forthcoming book chapter on the history of the Lanham Act and the influence of Edward S. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:39 am
Anyone wishing to provide input on the potential appointees’ qualifications is welcome to fill out the evaluation forms linked below, or to contact committee chair Alana Rotter at arotter@gmsr.com. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RexHeinke https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HonHollyThomas https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HonGregoryWeingart Also note, today's DJ has FRAPs do not allow district court to alter allocation of costs, by Hoge Fenton's Dennis Zell, about… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:13 am
Hoge Raad 17 juli 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1280, NIPR 2020, 487 (V Marine Fuels/Dexhon c.s.) / p. 748-759 This article discusses the judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court dated 17 July 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1280. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:08 am
Written by María Barral Martínez, a former trainee at the European Court of Justice (Chambers of AG Campos Sánchez-Bordona) and an alumna of the University of Amsterdam and the University of Santiago de Compostela The Hoge Raad Neederlanden (The Dutch Supreme Court), the referring court in the case Supreme Site Service and Others, C-186/19, harbours doubts regarding the international jurisdiction of Dutch courts under the Brussels I bis Regulation, in respect to a… [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:24 am
I looked at the write up on the Endrew F. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 9:02 am
The most important one is an obscure case called Stern v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 10:36 am
Het Hof kan dus ook wanbeleid vaststellen op grond van feiten die zich vóór 1 januari 2012 hebben voorgedaan. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:19 am
These were the important questions that the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) had referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Stichting Brein v Ziggo, C-610/15 (also known as The Pirate Bay case).The AG OpinionIn his Opinion in February last [commented here, here, and to some extent here] Advocate General (AG) Szpunar answered both questions in the affirmative. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:10 am
These were the important questions that the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) had referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Stichting Brein v Ziggo, C-610/15 (also known as The Pirate Bay case).The AG OpinionIn his Opinion in February last [commented here, here, and to some extent here] Advocate General (AG) Szpunar answered both questions in the affirmative. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:29 am
In this case, according to the Court, there is no ‘new public’, and therefore no copyright-relevant communication which requires separate permission from the rightholders.Prof VisserIn the early 1980s, the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) ruled that in the case of cable retransmission within the reception area, there is a ‘communication to the public’. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:47 am
De Hoge Raad is het daarmee eens: Het oordeel van het hof strookt met de regel van art. 13 Fw dat handelingen van de curator die zijn verricht na vernietiging van het vonnis tot faillietverklaring, maar vóór of op de dag waarop aan het voorschrift tot aankondiging overeenkomstig art. 15 Fw is voldaan, voor de schuldenaar geldig en verbindend blijven (vgl. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:33 pm
In coming to this conclusion the Hoge Raad quoted extensively from the standards developed by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in 2013 in Vinter and others v United Kingdom and in 2016 in Murray v The Netherlands but then set them out and developed them further in its own words. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:22 am
BEN HOGE, in his capacity as current Water Commissioner for the Perry v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am
Infringement of EU law and the duty of using the legal remedies pursuant to Art. 34 N. 1 Reg. 44 / 2001 The Dutch Hoge Raad in Diageo Brands BV v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:49 am
ABP, Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) 2 December 1994, NJ 1995, 288, and Constance et al. v. [read post]
