Search for: "Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project" Results 181 - 200 of 292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Cian Murphy
Holder v Humanitarian Law Project is a decision (6-3) of the US Supreme Court on the validity of US material support legislation. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
 I entered law school very interested in constitutional law, politics, and media. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:02 pm by Carter Ruml
It is not often that the GWOT affects the world of T&E law, but  the Supreme Court’s June 21 6-3 opinion in Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
” In The Hill, David Cole, who represented the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Humanitarian Law Project and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:29 pm
Humanitarian Law Project The federal government may prohibit providing non-violent material support for terrorist organizations - including legal services and advice - without violating the free speech clause of the First Amendment.Gun Control: McDonald v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court last week handed down a decision in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project which has caused very considerable controversy as it would seem very significantly to restrict the right under the US Constitution to freedom of expression. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
Humanitarian Law Project. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Humanitarian Law Project to reject the government’s position that the “material support” statute constitutionally forbids non-violent advocacy that is coordinated with organizations that have been designated as involved with terrorism. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On June 21, in one of its last decisions of the term, Holder v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Russ Bensing
”  In Holder v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:38 am by John Dzienkowski
Renee's post was here, and since then we've seen some skeptical posts at Volokh, Lawyers, Guns & Money, and Opinio Juris. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am by Anna Christensen
Humanitarian Law Project) have all been updated to include links to the Court’s opinions. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm by zshapiro
The Supreme Court held in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project that one can be convicted of a crime for violating 18 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 I actually had a better seat than Nina Totenberg from NPR and Bill Mears of CNN; both were present to hear the opinions read from the bench.The high-point from that session was Chief Justice John Roberts reading the 6-3 majority opinion in the case of Humanitarian Law Project v Holder; followed by Justice Stephen Breyer reading his dissent (joined by Justices Ginsberg and Sotomayor). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
The decision in Holder v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:33 pm
By Mike Dorf Monday's decision in Holder v. [read post]