Search for: "Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project" Results 181 - 200 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Humanitarian Law Project the Court split on ideological lines (except for Stevens joining the conservatives) to uphold the application of the "material aid" law to people who wanted to assist the non-violent wings of listed terrorist organizations by training them in peaceful conflict resolution. 2) In Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:57 am by Stanley D. Radtke, Esq.
Humanitarian Law Project, which explicitly held that providing medicine did not fall within the criminal statute and was a protected activity. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:10 pm by Michael Moffitt
Robert Axelrod, surely familiar to most of us who teach dispute resolution, co-authored an Op-Ed in the New York Times shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am by Matthew Scarola
Humanitarian Law Project, which upheld a statute prohibiting the provision of “material support” to terrorist organizations. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
The petition reached the Court just a month after the Justices, in a 6-3 ruling on June 21 (Holder v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:37 am by Cian Murphy
This conclusion is a useful starting point for the other case I want to address: Holder v Humanitarian Law Project (see details here). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Cian Murphy
Holder v Humanitarian Law Project is a decision (6-3) of the US Supreme Court on the validity of US material support legislation. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
 I entered law school very interested in constitutional law, politics, and media. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:02 pm by Carter Ruml
It is not often that the GWOT affects the world of T&E law, but  the Supreme Court’s June 21 6-3 opinion in Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
” In The Hill, David Cole, who represented the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Humanitarian Law Project and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:29 pm
Humanitarian Law Project The federal government may prohibit providing non-violent material support for terrorist organizations - including legal services and advice - without violating the free speech clause of the First Amendment.Gun Control: McDonald v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court last week handed down a decision in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project which has caused very considerable controversy as it would seem very significantly to restrict the right under the US Constitution to freedom of expression. [read post]