Search for: "Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project"
Results 101 - 120
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Humanitarian Law Project), prisoners locked in brutal isolation units (Beard v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Humanitarian Law Project). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 5:52 am
Humanitarian Law Project. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
Humanitarian Law Project. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Humanitarian Law Project: we have the right to independently advocate for foreign terrorist organizations, and we have the right to be members of such organizations. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:12 am
Humanitarian Law Project. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:05 am
Humanitarian Law Project, holding that the “federal government may prohibit providing non-violent material support for terrorist organizations including legal services and advice. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court laid down the law on speech and material support in Holder v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Humanitarian Law Project. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm
I thought I’d also pass along something I wrote along similar lines three years ago, after Humanitarian Law Project was decided: [Consider a fact pattern that] comes from the treason-by-propaganda cases, such as the Axis Sally case, Gillars v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:28 am
Humanitarian Law Project and Salazar v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
For example, in Holder v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm
Humanitarian Law Project, in which the justices upheld the “material support” provision of the PATRIOT Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
Humanitarian Law Project and Sorrell. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am
Holder (copyright extension); Knox v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
Mehanna has demanded attention because it provides an opportunity to interpret the Supreme Court’s still-controversial 2010 decision in Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Some of it was drawn from earlier Lawfare posts; some of it was original; significant parts came from a project that Ken and I have been working on explaining the Obama administration’s speeches on national security legal issues. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
Humanitarian Law Project (full disclosure: I served as co-counsel with Brad Berenson on an amicus brief supporting the government in that case, which Bobby and Ben and others signed). [read post]
