Search for: "Holder v. Lynch" Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm by N. Peter Rasmussen
She concluded that the alleged misstatements concerned only the valuation of the funds and were not made in connection with the purchase or sale of covered securities.Judge Scheindlin recognized that the Supreme Court interpreted the "in connection with" requirement rather broadly in the 2006 Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
The Company’s board of directors established a special committee to negotiate the redemption and conditioned the redemption of the shares on the approval by the special committee and the holders of a majority of the outstanding Class V shares. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
Yesterday the Court issued two opinions: in Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 12:34 am
Lynch QUEENS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawReturn of Security Deposit Collateral Agreement, Did Not Run With the Land; Landlord Not Liable Bayside Plaza Associates LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:24 am
Lynch QUEENS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawReturn of Security Deposit Collateral Agreement, Did Not Run With the Land; Landlord Not Liable Bayside Plaza Associates LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITLegal ProfessionFree With Registration: State High Court Must Resolve Champerty Issues Arising From Assignment of Contract Rights Trust for the Certificate Holders of the Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc., plaintiff-appellant v. [read post]