Search for: "Holder v. Lynch" Results 61 - 80 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
Discussing discrimination based on gender identity, Goltz pointed to two recent rulings that found employees were protected from employment bias on that basis: Glenn v Brumby (11thCir 2011) and Macy v Holder (EEOC Appeal No 0120120821, April 20, 2012). [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 8:13 pm by The Charge
It must be so construed as to confer some effective power.United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
And finally, on June 20, 2011 the Court held in the Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
In an attempt to escape the obvious conclusion that the common stock is a covered security, the plaintiffs argued that the stock must actually be traded to qualify, and cited Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
    In an attempt to escape the obvious conclusion that the common stock is a covered security, the plaintiffs argued that the stock must actually be traded to qualify, and cited Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
Yesterday the Court issued two opinions: in Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]