Search for: "Holder v. Lynch" Results 81 - 100 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
(S.D.N.Y. 2-16-2010), after losing one of two domain names in Bank of America Corporation and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:42 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Ch. 2004)(Once directors take it upon themselves to disclose information, that information must not be misleading); See also Lynch v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm by N. Peter Rasmussen
She concluded that the alleged misstatements concerned only the valuation of the funds and were not made in connection with the purchase or sale of covered securities.Judge Scheindlin recognized that the Supreme Court interpreted the "in connection with" requirement rather broadly in the 2006 Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
  Click here to go to www.nylj.com   Trust for the Certificate Holders of the Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
A lynch mob formed for the purpose of attacking the Chinatown portion of the city. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:05 pm
" Sarl Louis Feraud Int'l v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
The Delaware courts have long wrestled with the Fiduciary Duty of Disclosure (FDD), though its roots, and its relevance to controllers, date back (as a “duty of complete candor”) to 1978 with the Supremes’ Lynch v. [read post]