Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 4,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 6:01 am by Chris Gafner
In the case, the applicant had entered the United States as a K-1 visa holder and married his K-1 visa petitioner. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:52 am by Lawrence Solum
Elizabeth Holland (Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, Harvard University) has posted Holder v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm by Kevin Johnson
Holder decided in December, the Court is likely to decide Vartelas v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:35 am
The Chief Justice responded: “General Holder, on behalf of the Court, I welcome you as the chief law officer of the United States government and as an officer of this Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am by appealattorneylaw
Now that the Mardi Gras season is over, the federal criminal defense and immigration defense lawyers in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami Dade county may want to take a few moments moment to read a newly issued opinion from the United States Supreme Court: Kawashima v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm by Linda McClain
United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became the second federal court of appeals to strike down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
" Section 1498(a) further provides that whenever a patented invention "is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof . . . the owner's remedy shall be by action against the United States in the [CFC] for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use or manufacture. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:40 pm by One LLP
Following a string of cases that recently challenged various aspects of copyright law on constitutional grounds, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to the case of Golan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:45 am by Nancy L. Urizar, Ph.D.
On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments for the case of Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am by Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman
II, defined to include “all persons who can be said to hold an office under the government” in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am by admin
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am by Daniel Tokaji
It’s interesting that the United States hasn’t relied on the Elections Clause in its defense of Sections 4(b) and 5. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
Now up here  on the official DOJ website is the "Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder Regarding United States V. [read post]