Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
United States, supra. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:19 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:18 am
On November 10, 2009, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a case that arose from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Kucana v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
United States (No. 08-108), argued earlier this Term, Nijhawan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
United States and Nken v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In 2010, Judge Brookman received the Director’s Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder, in Washington, DC, for superior performance as an Assistant United States Attorney, for his work on the United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:16 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:59 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Rachel Kovner seemed to make somewhat inconsistent arguments. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:03 pm
See, Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:36 am
Campbell The United States Supreme Court was presented with the question of who has the burden of proof when a licensee files an action seeking a declaration of non-infringement against the patentee. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:41 pm
United States 13-457 Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
In Lin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:01 pm
Holder, have been lawful permanent residents of the United States since 1984. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
