Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 69,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm
For instance, in tweeting out an announcement of its proposed replacement for the Clean Power Plan vacated in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 10:30 am
Monroe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am
In May 2024, Colorado became the first state to adopt comprehensive AI-related legislation, as discussed here. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:10 am
See Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Erie Railroad v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
In a 4-2 decision in Oberholzer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 9:05 am
United StatesMoody v. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
The Fund holds and invests the assets of the New YorkState and Local Retirement System on behalf of more than one million state and local government employees and retirees and their beneficiaries. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
The Fund holds and invests the assets of the New YorkState and Local Retirement System on behalf of more than one million state and local government employees and retirees and their beneficiaries. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 2:22 am
The Court referred to CNQ v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm
”The False Claims Act imposes treble damages and penalties on those who knowingly and falsely claim money from the United States or knowingly fail to pay money owed to the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm
" Accord State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:34 pm
So holds today's Ninth Circuit opinion in Hunter v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:48 pm
Remember how during the Sarah Palin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 11:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 10:31 am
On August 7, 2024, in Santee v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
Following the ruling, the FTC stated that it is considering an appeal. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
Following the ruling, the FTC stated that it is considering an appeal. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
Following the ruling, the FTC stated that it is considering an appeal. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and explicitly distinguished its more recent holding on the President’s removal power as to single-head agencies therefrom, Seila Law LLC v. [read post]