Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 63,350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2025, 9:53 am
Compare City & Cnty. of Honolulu v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 8:14 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:10 am
Transitional Justice Mechanisms of Chapter V The transitional justice mechanisms, first introduced in Chapter V of an August 2015 peace agreement, were the product of a concerted effort by South Sudanese civil society and the African Union. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am
In the United States, the view that tech platforms are outposts of free speech and democracy has been leveraged to grant the industry sweeping immunity from liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
14 May 2025, 5:16 am
LLC v Levine, 128 AD3d 620, 621 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
14 May 2025, 12:15 am
Leaser v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 9:01 pm
We agree that a tariff classification has no claim to judicial deference under Chevron, there being no indication that Congress intended such a ruling to carry the force of law, but we hold that under Skidmore v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 2:32 pm
" Jacobellis v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 2:03 pm
However, Hearn v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 2:02 pm
"] A short excerpt from today's long decision by Magistrate Judge Brian Tsuchida in Hadnagy v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 7:50 am
It’s not exactly America’s small perch fish (the snail darter) that famously blocked the completion of a dam in the fundamental Endangered Species Act case, TVA v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 7:03 am
Washington, filed in Seattle by a group of four states; and Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 6:38 am
Each had close ties to Washington state. [read post]
13 May 2025, 6:05 am
” One example is Young v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 5:41 am
This ruling by the Appellate Division Second Department provides some guidance, holding that the state law aligns with the New York City Human Rights Law, long recognized as one of the most liberal antidiscrimination laws in the country.The case is Wright v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 4:00 am
Here is a recent example:In Brandon v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 2:38 am
Each had close ties to Washington state. [read post]
13 May 2025, 12:19 am
So – hold your breath everyone. [read post]
12 May 2025, 10:00 pm
See Feliciano v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 9:01 pm
Ullman, which pre-figured the majority holding, but not the rationale, of Griswold v. [read post]