Search for: "Holland v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 2:06 pm
If I can trust my statistics tools, I have had about 9.500 visitors so far, mainly form the United States (20,9%), Germany (19,0%), United Kingdom (7,6%) Japan (7,3%) and Holland (6,4%). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:10 am
United States unanimously rebuffed efforts by two defendants to broaden an exception to mandatory firearm sentences under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:07 am
”Addressing the merits of Diederich’s ultra vires argument, the court said that “retaining a law firm to prepare an amicus brief for a case pending before the United States Supreme Court that includes an issue of significance to the Authority falls within the powers conferred to the Authority by the Legislature,” citing Public Authorities Law §2053-c [4]; §2053-e [12]..* The brief amicus curiae [friend of the court] had been prepared by… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:32 am
United States, No. 09-837, by clicking here. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Case New Holland, Inc., 566 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
Ditto United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
Body: On October 6, 2010, United States District Judge John E. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:36 am
“It was very interesting today, hearing your argument in Holland v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:13 pm
The case is Holland USA, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
United States, 128 S. [read post]