Search for: "Holland v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:43 pm
On October 22, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the ’087 patent, entitled “Instrument for Treating an Ocular Disorder. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Ashad Umrani, et al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 6:39 pm
Michael's, a non-profit organization, "is a vocal critic of the mainstream Catholic Church," including the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops ("USCCB"). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:03 am
Michael's, a non-profit organization, "is a vocal critic of the mainstream Catholic Church," including the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops ("USCCB"). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:12 pm
A native of Cuba, Prieto moved to the United States with his parents when he was seven years old. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:42 am
United States, 552 U.S. 74, 83 (2007), that trade was no longer considered a crime. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
Writing After Roe made me hopeful for debates about reproductive rights in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Some troopers said the unit “does not accept females. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Most people would agree that the Supreme Court is one of the most important government institutions of the United States, due to its power of judicial review rooted in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
T he ECHR has also recognised that art 8 protects against nuisances, such as noise pollution and toxic fumes (López Ostra v Spain (1994) 20 EHRR 277 (ECHR) at [44]–[58]; Guerra v Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357 (ECHR); Moreno Gómez v Spain (2005) 41 EHRR 40 (ECHR); and Arrondelle v United Kingdom (1982) 26 DR 5.) [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:05 pm
Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 383 (1953). [read post]
