Search for: "Holland v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 6:25 am
United States (08-1394) — constitutionality and scope of “honest services” fraud law; effect of pre-trial publicity Tuesday, March 2: McDonald v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm
Hollander responded to Fustolo's allegations that she stirred public sentiment against him in the series of articles that forced him to scuttle building projects by filing a motion to dismiss the defamation suit pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, sec. 59H, which states in part: "In any case in which a party asserts that the civil claims...against said party are based on said party's exercise of its right of petition under the constitution of the United States or of the… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm
United States, Hardt, Rent-a-Center West v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
Ditto United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
And even if one disagrees with Holland, the Court’s more recent decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:56 am
These terms have been held to be binding by the United States Supreme Court in Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
At the Conglomerate, Tamara Piety discusses the likely impact of Citizens United on a series of civil RICO cases filed by the United States against tobacco companies; petitions for certiorari in the case are currently before the Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
United States, Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
" n110 In this passage, "means" is code for a technology with particular structural properties, and "a desired result" is a functional property.In Holland Furniture Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:14 pm
CiteID=465579Certified Question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, The Honorable William C. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:39 am
United States, 930 F.2d 867, 869 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
However, courts have sometimes noted egregious attorney misconduct, on the part of both defense counsel (Holland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:27 am
Day, P.C., of Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
T he ECHR has also recognised that art 8 protects against nuisances, such as noise pollution and toxic fumes (López Ostra v Spain (1994) 20 EHRR 277 (ECHR) at [44]–[58]; Guerra v Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357 (ECHR); Moreno Gómez v Spain (2005) 41 EHRR 40 (ECHR); and Arrondelle v United Kingdom (1982) 26 DR 5.) [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
