Search for: "Holland v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am by Rishabh Bhandari, David Hopen
The announcement comes a month after China’s anger was provoked by a State Department report claiming that China had been limiting counterterrorism cooperation with the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
The British parliament joins the United States Congress, the U.S. administration, the European parliament, and the Council of Europe in declaring the Islamic State’s genocide. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am by Barry Sookman
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am by Alex R. McQuade
Tamara Wittes argued that the United States cannot save Egypt from itself. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 4:32 pm
United States (2014) would confirm or overrule Justice Holmes’s canonical decision in Missouri v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm by Elina Saxena
Naseer was indicted by federal authorities in 2010 and extradited from Great Britain to the United States in 2013. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
 The case of Andrew Fitch-Holland, the co-accused in the trial, has been reduced to the status of a “sideshow”, according to his QC, Jonathan Laidlaw. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]