Search for: "Holland v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Danail V. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
(This is also likely to be the case under the fledgling tort of intrusion into seclusion established in C v Holland [2012] NZHC 2155.) [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:48 pm
Lynch v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
The Times reports that North Korea has attempted to strike a deal with the United States: the dictatorship would halt its nuclear tests in exchange for the United States suspending routine military exercises with South Korea. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 8:18 am
Lynch v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:58 am
Circuit misapplied this Court’s Holland decision when it ruled – in direct conflict with a holding of the Federal Circuit on materially similar facts – that the Tribe did not face an “extraordinary circumstance” warranting equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for filing of Indian Self-Determination Act claims under the Contract Disputes Act? [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
United States, which asks the question: Was it the government that went overboard? [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
And even if one disagrees with Holland, the Court’s more recent decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
United States, which addressed a challenge to a statute that Congress passed in 1998 to implement the Chemical Weapons Convention (“CWC”). [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Holland asked Mr. [read post]
