Search for: "Hollinger, Inc. v. Hollinger International" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2007, 9:21 am
Black, the ultimate controlling stockholder of Hollinger International, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:06 am by Simon Fodden
As everyone will know by now, Conrad Black’s six libel actions in respect of statements posted on the Hollinger International, Inc. website will be allowed to proceed in Ontario. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm
-based media company, Hollinger International Inc, like a “corporate kleptocracy”.Black, 67, is currently serving a prison sentence in Florida for fraud and obstruction of justice and expects to be released next month. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:58 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder] which vacated the conviction of the former chairman and CEO of Hollinger International Inc. under the honest services doctrine. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Black, and two of his fellow executives at Hollinger International, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 4:59 pm
") Let's put Steyn's hagiography in perspective by going to Delaware Vice Chancellor Leo Strine's opinion in Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:41 am by Steve Bainbridge
Delaware Vice Chancellor Leo Strine's opinion in Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Black, which was a Canadian libel case brought by the disgraced press baron, Conrad Black, Baron Black of Crossharbour, against officers and directors of his company, Hollinger International, Inc., who, after an investigation, determined that Hollinger had improperly paid Lord Black millions of dollars, to the detriment of shareholders. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Black v Breedan, Black brought an action for libel against directors, advisers and a vice-president of Hollinger International for statements posted on the Hollinger website. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 10:06 pm by Michael Geist
Breeden, involves postings such as press releases and reports on the Hollinger International, Inc. website that Black claims were defamatory. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Defendant-petitioners in this case—executives of the publicly-held U.S. company Hollinger International, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
DeMerchant for conflict of interest stemming out of their representation of Hollinger International Inc. and related parties in, inter alia, the sale of Hollinger newspaper assets to CanWest. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
LSUC dismissal of disciplinary proceedings against Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick.The reasons issued by the LSUC for finding Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick had not been in a conflict of interest when representing Hollinger International Inc. and Conrad Black during the sale of Hollinger’s newspaper businesses to CanWest, are not especially interesting as a matter of doctrinal law (the DeMerchant decision is here). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
The LSUC is also likely to release its decision in the disciplinary hearing of Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick in their representation of Hollinger Inc. [read post]