Search for: "Holloway v. Attorney General United States" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Tuan Samahon
United States, a per curiam three-judge district court held that the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act violated the separation of powers because the statute had given the Comptroller General executive powers and Congress previously held the qualified power to remove the Comptroller for cause. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am by Shawn Dominy
  However, as a criminal defense lawyer, I have been asked about Qualified Immunity due to recent events in the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:21 am by Bill Otis
Lynch, who is the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, to request that she vacate two of Mr. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Taylor to apply the automatic reversal rule in Holloway v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Shapiro, 302 F.Supp. 761, 764 (D.C.Conn.1969), appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 488, 90 S.Ct. 641, 24 L.Ed.2d 677; Holloway v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Shapiro, 302 F.Supp. 761, 764 (D.C.Conn.1969), appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 488, 90 S.Ct. 641, 24 L.Ed.2d 677; Holloway v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Holloway, No. 05-2229 Conviction for possession of ammunition by a felon is affirmed where the district court correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress since the defendant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes until after he fled from officers. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
The court held that the burden imposed by the statute was not undue or excessive and the state had a compelling interest in having a minimum vote requirement before a candidate could appear on the general election ballot. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]