Search for: "Holmes v. Powers" Results 1 - 20 of 643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Ben
But there is a difference here: the allegation was that material had been copied from a work that was still in copyright:  "A Slight Trick of the Mind" is set in 1947 and the long-retired Sherlock Holmes, now 93, lives in a remote Sussex farmhouse with his housekeeper and her young son: "He tends to his bees, writes in his journal, and grapples with the diminishing powers of his mind. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
He did not believe in the biblical God, preferring instead to think broadly in terms of an unknowable power that transcended the physical world. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am by Ben
In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm by Curtis Bradley
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important case concerning the government’s foreign affairs powers, Bond v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:29 pm by Nick Rosenkranz
Cruz thus argues that Justice Holmes’s opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Robert Harlan, however, had risen from slavery to wealth and power. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:27 am
How does Judge Posner reconcile his great fondness and respect for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Holm, 285 U.S. 355 (1932), in which the Court held that the "legislative" power of the state under Article I, section 4 was defined by the state's constitution and, therefore, included the governor's veto power). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:53 am by Sarah Johnson Phillips
(Eastern) Join Stoel Rives Partner, Bill Holmes, as he presents this exclusive, 60-minute webinar on Thursday, March 31. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:21 am by Christine Corcos
The decision was six to three, featuring strong dissents by Brandeis, McReynolds, and Holmes. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:21 am
The decision was six to three, featuring strong dissents by Brandeis, McReynolds, and Holmes. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:36 pm by Josh Blackman
It upheld the state's power to impose a nominal fine on an unvaccinated person. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
Huston then left the premises with those items, the laptop, and its power cord.U.S. v. [read post]