Search for: "Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2016, 6:41 am by Mark Astarita
Securities and Exchange CommissionThe reappointed members of the Committee are:Stephen Holmes, General Partner Emeritus, InterWest PartnersBarbara Roper, Director of Investor Protection, Consumer Federation of AmericaKurt Schacht, Managing Director, CFA InstituteAnne Sheehan, Director of Corporate Governance, California State Teachers’ Retirement SystemDamon Silvers, Director of Policy and Special Counsel,… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Richard Renner
One of the most notorious loopholes exists under the securities laws, in which employees who report fraud upon stockholders have no protection under federal law. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Dyson, K&L Gates LLP, on Saturday, January 21, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Broker-dealers, BSA/AML, Disclosure, Due diligence, Financial institutions, FINRA, High-frequency trading, Investor protection, Money laundering, Private enforcement, Reporting regulation, Risk management, Securities enforcement Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2017 Posted by Kerry E. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
One of the more significant recent developments in the corporate and securities litigation arena has been the emergence of the debate over fee-shifting bylaws following the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, where the Supreme Court interpreted “by reason of” in a RICO statute by looking at how the phrase was applied in the context of the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & Ors [2015] EWHC 1300 http://t.co/0DT1Nmp9wC -> No copyright in seismic data, ResourceEye Services Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:53 pm by admin
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, which held that the civil RICO Act contained both “but for” causation and proximate causation requirements. [read post]