Search for: "Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 6:41 am
Securities and Exchange CommissionThe reappointed members of the Committee are:Stephen Holmes, General Partner Emeritus, InterWest PartnersBarbara Roper, Director of Investor Protection, Consumer Federation of AmericaKurt Schacht, Managing Director, CFA InstituteAnne Sheehan, Director of Corporate Governance, California State Teachers’ Retirement SystemDamon Silvers, Director of Policy and Special Counsel,… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
One of the most notorious loopholes exists under the securities laws, in which employees who report fraud upon stockholders have no protection under federal law. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Dyson, K&L Gates LLP, on Saturday, January 21, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Broker-dealers, BSA/AML, Disclosure, Due diligence, Financial institutions, FINRA, High-frequency trading, Investor protection, Money laundering, Private enforcement, Reporting regulation, Risk management, Securities enforcement Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2017 Posted by Kerry E. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
One of the more significant recent developments in the corporate and securities litigation arena has been the emergence of the debate over fee-shifting bylaws following the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Daniel O’Connor, Daniel V. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, where the Supreme Court interpreted “by reason of” in a RICO statute by looking at how the phrase was applied in the context of the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court in the 2010 case of Morrison v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:13 pm
Holmes, et al.). [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:30 am
Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & Ors [2015] EWHC 1300 http://t.co/0DT1Nmp9wC -> No copyright in seismic data, ResourceEye Services Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
Levinson in the context of a securities fraud case.[10] It is important to note the context of TSC Industries v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:53 pm
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, which held that the civil RICO Act contained both “but for” causation and proximate causation requirements. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
McDonald, UNSECURED CLAIMS FOR CONTRACT-BASED ATTORNEY'S FEES: FOBIAN IS DEAD, BUT DOES JUSTICE HOLMES' DECISION IN RANDOLPH & RANDOLPH v. [read post]