Search for: "Holtzman v. Holtzman"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Holtzman v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:20 am
Oral Argument in case# 11-3188; Ira Holtzman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:36 pm
The case is Holtzman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:36 pm
The case is Holtzman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:30 pm
By Eric Goldman Holtzman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:52 am
On May 14, 2007, a federal jury rendered a verdict in Miller v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:57 pm
Marinescu v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
N.A. v Cutler, 112 AD3d 573). [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
Holtzman v Griffith 2018 NY Slip Op 04540 Decided on June 20, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department, aside from its lesson on “account stated” tells us that a legal malpractice claim from a settled divorce action has many hurdles to jump. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:57 pm
Holtzman, C.A. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Caluda, APLC, et al v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Caluda, APLC, et al v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:38 am
Holtzman signed a contract with Leer Services. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:49 am
Independent contractors and Title VIIHoltzman v The World Book Company Inc., USDC, EDPa. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Philip Gordon is an associate at Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky PLLC and contributed to the NRCC’s brief. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
In this action brought pursuant to Article 78 of New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Appellate Division considered the equivalent of two such ancient writs being sought by the Petitioner, a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Prohibition.With respect to the Writ of Mandamus the court said that "The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
In this action brought pursuant to Article 78 of New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Appellate Division considered the equivalent of two such ancient writs being sought by the Petitioner, a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Prohibition.With respect to the Writ of Mandamus the court said that "The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:01 am
In Holtzman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 7:37 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564 and other cases, the Appellate Division explained that "[b]ecause of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court -- in cases where judicial authority is challenged -- acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers". [read post]
