Search for: "Home Insurance Co. v. New York" Results 261 - 280 of 524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
New York, in which the Supreme Court struck down a New York statute regulating bakers' hours on the grounds that it interfered with individuals' freedom to contract for themselves. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Under New York law, the no-action clause of a trust indenture barred noteholders' suit alleging that the corporation's issuance of a dividend and planned spin off a business were fraudulent transfers. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:50 am by Rick St. Hilaire
  The two were indicted last year in a New York federal district court in for their alleged roles in trafficking antiquities. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Supreme Court Holds Agreement Provision Prohibiting Divorce until Apartment Sold Violated Public Policy Governing Divorces in New York           In Filstein v Bromberg, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1167458 (N.Y.Sup.) the parties were married in 1989. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  By the early 1990s, we were down to just 20 AAAs, and at the dawn of our new millennium you could count America’s AAA-rated companies on two hands even if you’d lost a finger… only 9 remained. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:14 am by Mark S. Humphreys
An attorney for New York Life Insurance Co. also wants the Western Washington court to decide what should happen with a $1 million policy for Susan Powell, Josh Powell's missing wife. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am by David Oscar Markus
We didn’t want to be another group of schmuckstap-dancing Los Angeles or New York. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
It is within the discretionary power of Supreme Court to award counsel fees and, in doing so, "a court should review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all the other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative merit of the parties' positions" ( DeCabrera v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am by Mandelman
Dix, 47 U.S.C. 507 (1848) and its progeny; see also Home Building & Loan Association v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Co., 55 AD3d 879, 880-881), and defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]