Search for: "Home Insurance Co. v. New York" Results 341 - 360 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
Co. v Whiting, 53 AD3d 1033, 1035; see generally Zappone v Home Ins. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
Co. (4th Dept., decided 6/11/2010) New York's third-party bad faith failure to settle within policy limits standard is: "To prevail in . . . an action [seeking damages for an insurer's bad faith refusal to settle an underlying action], a plaintiff must establish that the insured lost an actual opportunity to settle the . . . [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:56 am by Russell Jackson
  Plaintiffs did not disagree, but simply argued that New York had an interest in imposing its law because Topps was a New York company. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
Florida Power & Light Co., 511 U.S. 222 (1994). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
”   In arriving at the decision, the judge distinguished related decisions, such as a decision by the New York Federal District Court, Brady v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm by Brian E. Barreira
In 1997, in response to a lawsuit filed by the New York State Bar Association, the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
Dubbs of the New York City firm of Labaton Sucharow. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:58 am
Co., 9 NY3d 264, 267), we conclude that defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the policy does not provide coverage for the loss herein (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
“From the beginning of his time as a Justice, you could see Stevens’s roots in the New Deal Court and his willingness to justify an expanding welfare state,” Richard Epstein, a libertarian-leaning law professor at New York University, said. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
High Court Weighs Title Insurer's Liability for Attorney's Theft of Client Funds New Jersey Law Journal The New Jersey Supreme Court is deciding if a title insurer can be held liable for a lawyer's theft of a home buyer's funds if it fails to tell the buyer directly it is not responsible for the lawyer's misdeeds. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:55 am by Mehmet Munur
Not finding any case that invalidated a contract based on electronic signatures, the court turned to State of New York Insurance Department opinions. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:54 am
Id. at 137 (internal quotation marks omitted).The court also discussed but distinguished the New York Appellate Division's decisions in Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]