Search for: "Home Insurance Co. v. New York" Results 41 - 60 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2008, 9:10 am
Furthermore, the homeowner's policy indicates that both the plaintiff and Dean are named insureds with respect to "12 Orchard Street" in Warwick, New York. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
I've written before on the question of whether liability insurers should investigate coverage issues in New York. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:28 pm by GGCRBHS&M
Following an appeal in Gregware v City of New York, the Appellate Division First Department ordered that a retrial on apportionment between the defendants be held. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:24 am
Ct., Erie Co., decided 8/19/2009) New York Insurance Law § 3420(a) mandates that certain provisions be included in all policies issued or delivered in New York State that insure against liability for "injury to person . . . or . . . injury to, or destruction of, property[.] [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:54 am
Id. at 137 (internal quotation marks omitted).The court also discussed but distinguished the New York Appellate Division's decisions in Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Co., 55 AD3d 879, 880-881), and defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York, and Argonaut cross-moved to vacate the portion of the award requiring it to indemnify Global for the IBNR claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:50 pm
So what rights would we New Yorkers have to compensation in the event of a New York Nuclear Power Plant Catastrophe? [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:53 am
Since defendant Scuderi, the named insured, did not reside with his son-in-law Ramos at the premises where the underlying incident occurred, and Ramos did not live in or occupy the premises where defendant Scuderi resided on the date of the underlying incident, Ramos cannot be considered a relative who resided in the named insured's household (see Biundo v New York Central Mutual, 14 AD3d 559 [2005]; cf. [read post]