Search for: "Home Insurance Co. v. New York"
Results 141 - 160
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm
J. v American Home Assur. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:17 am
Co.(3rd Dept., decided 11/30/2017)No, not HOME as in four-fifths of the Greats Lakes. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
For example, in February 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, applying New York law, reversed a lower court’s rejection of the disclosure-only settlement of a suit that had been filed in connection with Verizon’s proposed acquisition of Vodafone subsidiaries holding ownership interests in Verizon Wireless, as discussed here. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:36 am
Based in New York, the firm invests in healthcare and several other sectors. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Home Insurance Co., “the law is clear that a reasonable settlement binds the insurer to indemnify. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Home Insurance Co., “the law is clear that a reasonable settlement binds the insurer to indemnify. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Thus, a challenge for error in the application of New York law governing the Bermuda Form is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence that the tribunal consciously disregarded the provisions of New York law.4 Furthermore, an English court will permit a challenge based on an error of law only if certain conditions are met, and the challenger must show that “the decision of the tribunal on the question is obviously wrong” or that “the question… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Thus, a challenge for error in the application of New York law governing the Bermuda Form is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence that the tribunal consciously disregarded the provisions of New York law.4 Furthermore, an English court will permit a challenge based on an error of law only if certain conditions are met, and the challenger must show that “the decision of the tribunal on the question is obviously wrong” or that “the question… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:34 am
A New York trial court held last week in American Home Assurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:34 am
A New York trial court held last week in American Home Assurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Faulkner v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Faulkner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
With regard to the substantive law, one of the reasons that insurers have long favored New York substantive law is because, as home historically to many insurers, New York has a well-developed body of law applicable to insurance policies of all kinds and many believe that New York law tends to favor the rights and interests of insurers. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
With regard to the substantive law, one of the reasons that insurers have long favored New York substantive law is because, as home historically to many insurers, New York has a well-developed body of law applicable to insurance policies of all kinds and many believe that New York law tends to favor the rights and interests of insurers. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:32 pm
She had argued for the Southern District of New York as an alternate venue to Illinois. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
***Last week, I had the privilege of presenting at PLI in New York for a conference titled Trade Secrets 2017: What Every Lawyer Should Know. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
New developments have imposed additional responsibilities on company directors and officers in the cybersecurity area – most recently in sweeping regulations promulgated by the New York State Department of Financial Services. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
New developments have imposed additional responsibilities on company directors and officers in the cybersecurity area – most recently in sweeping regulations promulgated by the New York State Department of Financial Services. [read post]
