Search for: "Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
In Honda Motor Co v Oberg (512 U.S. 415 (1994)), for instance, Ginsburg dissented from the Court’s decision that an amendment to the Oregon Constitution that prevented review of a punitive-damage award violated the Due Process Clause of the federal Constitution, referring to other protections against excessive punitive-damage awards in Oregon law. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and upholding the maximum amount a rational jury could award on the record so viewed (measured by the relevant legal guideposts), based on Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
Virginia viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and upholding the maximum amount a rational jury could award on the record so viewed (measured by the relevant legal guideposts), based on Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 4:44 am
Justice Ginsburg’s dissent in Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]