Search for: "Hood v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
United Kingdom, known as the Irish State Case. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
  If you remember, Lackey said he didn't go to AG Jim Hood with his qualms about the overtures by Tim Balducci because of what he heard about Scruggs putting heat on Hood, with Moore's involvement, so that Hood would help settle cases against State Farm. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
First off, let's deal with a bit of news from the ongoing trench warfare between the entity formerly known as the Scruggs Katrina Group and State Farm known as McIntosh v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:33 am
After the announcement of the settlement of a large class action lawsuit with State Farm, "Scruggs made an about face and requested the return of the Rigsbys/Scruggs documents from Attorney General Hood . . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:22 am
Skip to next paragraph Harry Campbell Related "Executioner Identities: Toward Recognizing a Right to Know Who Is Hiding Beneath the Hood" by Ellyde Roko (Fordham Law Review, April 2007) California First Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 4:48 pm
States that have killed inmates since the Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
 Because [Joey] Langston was awarded state contracts by Hood to sue prescription drug-maker Eli Lilly and MCI, Hood said he could not prosecute him. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am by corynne mcsherry and Jamie Williams
” Moreover, the court stated that it appeared “that Attorney General Hood is aware that federal law significantly restricts his ability to take action of the sort in question here. [read post]