Search for: "Hooks v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,569
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am
by Dennis Crouch In the trademark case of Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:51 am
But he cannot recover any damages because the defendants have qualified immunity.The case is Bangs v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 11:56 pm
Paine Webber v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:51 am
” This is true even with respect to the contract breach claim, despite the Barnes ruling: Barnes states that a platform may be on the hook if it makes a specific promise to the user “with the constructive intent that it be enforceable,” because such a promise operates like a “waiver” of CDA immunity. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Other critics have focused on SBA List v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm
Select Additional Sources Shortland, Anja, Lost Art: The Art Loss Register Casebook Vol I (2021) at page 9 ↑ ibid, at page 39 ↑ Cases discussed in this chapter by Shortland: United States of America v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:41 am
The prenup can redefine what the law considers to be your joint property v. your separate property, and it can waive one spouse’s rights to the other spouse’s property. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:18 pm
See, Tate v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
The post JORDAN BURRIS HOOKS v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
For a textualist court, territoriality poses a conundrum because it has no statutory hook in the Lanham Act. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit (unpublished): And the county would have been on the hook, had the trial court not screwed up the jury instructions. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Anytime a person moves into the state or a new baby is born, the state may be on the hook for providing social services. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
One web-based media report stated, without qualification, that Agent Orange “increases bladder cancer risk. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
They are merely the means by which the state seeks to control – regulate, if you like – the speech of end-users. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:00 am
1 Welch v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
The act of "permitting" tribes to intervene in state courts presumes a power to say what tribes can and can't do, and such power must have a juridical hook in the Constitution (Lopez), not be free-floating (Brackeen). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Rotella v. [read post]
