Search for: "Horne v. Department of Agriculture" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
Although the news is likely to be buried in the understandable hoopla over the same-sex marriage case, the Supreme Court today also agreed to review Horne v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Department of Agriculture, 14-275, puts the “crop” into our new relist crop. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:10 pm by Richard M. Re
Department of Agriculture, decided the first go-round in 2012. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:59 pm
The Hornes raised the Takings Clause as a defense against an order of the Department of Agriculture requiring that they pay the government $483,843.53, which was the government’s assessment of the value of the raisins, plus penalties. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Two years ago, the Supreme Court decided a federal jurisdiction case called Horne v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
” At Forbes, George Leef weighs in on Horne v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The Planning Department released a draft EIR which included a no project and smaller version of the project. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]