Search for: "Horne v. Department of Agriculture"
Results 81 - 100
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2015, 4:59 pm
The Hornes raised the Takings Clause as a defense against an order of the Department of Agriculture requiring that they pay the government $483,843.53, which was the government’s assessment of the value of the raisins, plus penalties. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:38 am
Department of Agriculture troubled me. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Two years ago, the Supreme Court decided a federal jurisdiction case called Horne v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Fox v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
” At Forbes, George Leef weighs in on Horne v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:29 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Horne v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Horne v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
Department of Agriculture, and Koontz v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:14 am
Supreme Court decision Horne v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:46 pm
Department of Agriculture, decided by the Court in June. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The Planning Department released a draft EIR which included a no project and smaller version of the project. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
This Term, in Horne v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:41 pm
Department of Agriculture, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In Horne v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm
In Horne v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 3:15 am
Ilya Somin argues that the Supreme Courts recent unanimous opinion in Horne v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
In a second unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Thomas, the Court in Horne v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:41 am
In essence, the Court’s ruling in a raisin growers’ case — Horne v. [read post]
