Search for: "Horne v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Smith & Nephew, by contrast, contended that “type” referred to a particular polymer – i.e. to the chemistry of the fibre. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment… [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
If the Court wanted to go down the path of emphasizing subjective motivations, it would have decided Trump v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:10 pm by Christopher Simon
This question was at the heart of a recent decision from the Georgia Court of Appeals, Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:14 am
I was also treated to hear a fellow with a fog-horn-like voice providing running commentary and tips to the coaching staff who were only about a half-mile too far away to hear it. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
At least Robert Smith’s motivation was to relieve his patients’ suffering. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Peter Groves
Ever since Lord Diplcok's speech in Catnic v Hill & Smith [1981] FSR 60, [1982] RPC 183 (HL) we have been familiar with the idea of a purposive approach to interpreting patent claims - considering what the applicant had in mind, the spirit of the claims, rather than the precise words used. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:30 am by Edward Smith
Call me, Ed Smith, anytime at 916-921-6400 if you were injured in or by a California train. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:09 am
Saurenman worked for Aviat, a corporation wholly owned by Stuart Horn, who was its president and the person in control of its day-to-day operations. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
With great respect to the judge in this case, it seems to me she was in error in the distinction she made as to the passage in Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police relied on by Lord Toulson in Michael. [read post]