Search for: "Horsley v. State"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 5:18 pm
State, (SC13-865) and Horsley v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:18 am
Horsley v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:26 am
” Further, the footnote expressly states, as held in Gordon v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:59 am
Nat’l Rifle Ass’n., 700 F.3d at 203-04; Horsley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 5:51 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 1:33 pm
Horsley v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:14 pm
V(1). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:02 pm
Thanks to Jamie Horsley for valuable comments and corrections. | Updated Sept. 3, 2021, to add the omitted word "collective" in Article 13, Item 2; thanks to Danping Yang for the correction. | Updated Sept. 7, 2021, to add the omitted phrase "and handling methods" to Article 73, Item 1; thanks to Mingli Shi for the correction. [read post]
