Search for: "Horton v. California"
Results 181 - 200
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
’ Horton v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:15 pm
, Horton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
By making clear its disapproval of the ruling by Judge Baer -- whom President Clinton named to the bench less than two years ago -- the Administration no doubt hoped for a neat pre-emptive strike that would keep the judge from becoming the negative icon of 1996, as Willie Horton was in the 1988 campaign. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
Relying on Strauss v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
They would be asking the California courts to declare Proposition 8 unconstitutional -- after its constitutionality (under State law) had already been upheld by the California Supreme Court [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
Horton, 207 P.3d 48, 69 (Cal. 2009); Order of Nov. 19, 2008, Strauss, Nos. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 10:16 am
App. 2000) (citing Horton v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:23 am
See Savva, 159 Vt. at 89, 616 A.2d at 782; accord Horton v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:11 am
Horton. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:11 pm
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:21 am
Cir. 1981), abrogated on other grounds, Horton v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
Justice Moreno dissented in Strauss v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:08 pm
Horton. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009), and represents San Francisco as a plaintiff-intervenor in the Perry case. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:52 am
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009), the California Supreme Court did not rule on the substantive validity of Section 7.5 under the state constitution's protections of due process, equal protection, and privacy. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:24 pm
" Bulacan, 156 F.3d at 968 (citing Horton v. [read post]
