Search for: "Horton v. California" Results 101 - 120 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2018, 11:47 am by Mark J. Levin and Alan S. Kaplinsky
According to a forthcoming article by Professors Andrea Chandrasekher and David Horton in the California Law Review, more consumers and their lawyers would take advantage of individual arbitration if states enacted non-waivable statutes allowing an arbitrator who awards a prevailing consumer fees and expenses under a fee-shifting statute to augment the award with an extra “bounty” for winning the arbitration. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:18 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
  California employers of course should be aware that at least one California state court (Iskanian v CLS) has rejected D.R. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
  More recently these laws spread to municipalities throughout the state (see, e.g., Horton v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:27 am by Walter Haines, Esq.
The NLRB did not apply the United States' Supreme Court's holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Only a few months after Italian Colors, the California Supreme Court got its first major chance to address the new landscape in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm by Orin Kerr
Brown (1983) 460 U.S. 730, 740, overruled on another point in Horton v. [read post]