Search for: "Horton v. California"
Results 141 - 160
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 9:24 am
TIME MAGAZINE picked up a piece published earlier this month in the SF Chronicle authored by two Pepperdine law profs who recommend that the California Supreme Court in Strauss v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
The following contribution to our arbitration symposium is by David Horton. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:48 am
Such piggybacking under these facts would smear the careful distinctions drawn by the Horton [v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
In its appeal (Campaign for California Families v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
Until June 6th, Bishop et al v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:13 am
Brady v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
That's Burns v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
If Horton and Gentry die, and PAGA is saved, you would think SCOTUS would leave California alone. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:32 am
In Reyes v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:37 am
Horton, 357 NLRB No. 184 (2012)). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:50 am
(Horton v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 10:16 am
App. 2000) (citing Horton v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
There has been much litigation both in California and on the federal level concerning the enforceability of class action waivers, the most recent important decision being that of the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
Relying on Strauss v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
The state of California’s stay application is in Kane v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
See Owen v. [read post]
