Search for: "Horton v. California"
Results 161 - 180
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:11 pm
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
Justice Moreno dissented in Strauss v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:08 pm
Horton. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:08 pm
Horton. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009), and represents San Francisco as a plaintiff-intervenor in the Perry case. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:52 am
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009), the California Supreme Court did not rule on the substantive validity of Section 7.5 under the state constitution's protections of due process, equal protection, and privacy. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:28 am
Margaret McKeown on Campaign for California Families' attempt to intervene in Perry v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:19 am
Schwarzenneger by the Campaign for California Families (CCF). [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
California, see Peter W. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
Horton 46 Cal.4th 364 (Cal. 2009), the California Supreme Court ruled that discrimination claims by same-sex couples must receive the most rigorous standard of constitutional review. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:31 am
09/10/09 ADF news release:In Burns v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:00 pm
Horton, 46 Cal.4th 364 (2009). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 7:48 am
In 1990, for instance, in Horton v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:09 am
Horton, and to not defend it in the federal lawsuit, Perry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:45 am
Horton. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
In its appeal (Campaign for California Families v. [read post]
