Search for: "Horton v. California" Results 161 - 180 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am by Michael Ginsborg
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009), and represents San Francisco as a plaintiff-intervenor in the Perry case. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:52 am
Horton, 49 Cal. 4th 364 (2009), the California Supreme Court did not rule on the substantive validity of Section 7.5 under the state constitution's protections of due process, equal protection, and privacy. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
Horton 46 Cal.4th 364 (Cal. 2009), the California Supreme Court ruled that discrimination claims by same-sex couples must receive the most rigorous standard of constitutional review. [read post]