Search for: "House v. Mullen"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 3:01 am
Salford City Council v Mullen: Hounslow London Borough Council v Hall; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby; Manchester City Council v Mushin (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 336; [2010] WLR (D) 91 ”Guidance for county courts hearing applications for possession orders by local authority landlords of non-secure tenancies where the occupier, being an… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
This appeal from the Court of Appeal, where it was known as Salford CC v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, was heard on 23-24 November and concerns the applicability of ECHR, art 8, to mandatory possession proceedings brought by local authorities in two contexts, namely: introductory tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V (Frisby [...] [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
No, according to Meyer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
Mullen was a Nebraska Catholic lawyer who won the tremendously important civil liberties case Meyer v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:32 am
Supreme Court’s “significant nexus” 2006 decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:46 pm
Defense Secretary Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Mullen will meet with President Obama at the White House at 2:45 p.m. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:07 am
Native American Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
Mike Mullen says, the military isn't suited or equipped to do so. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
This afternoon, President Obama transmitted to the chairs and ranking minority members of the Senate and House Committees with military oversight the certification signed by himself, Secretary of Defense Panetta, and Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Mullen, that the requirements set forth in the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010, Public Law 111-321, have been met. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
Mullens cross-appealed on the issue of visitation. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
Although the Supreme Court won’t actually be hearing the appeal in Salford v Mullen in November, it will be hearing the appeals in the cases of Hounslow v Powell, Leeds v Hall and Birmingham v Frisby. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:37 pm
Today’s roundup brings more on Supreme Court case Kiobel v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Oh, and for anyone waiting on tenterhooks for our report on Salford City Council v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336 (AKA the Famous Five), it is coming shortly, honest, but there is a lot to digest and, in the case of Manchester CC, a certain amount of bewilderment as to just what the hell they thought they were doing to get through. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
(Able v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., in which the Court will consider whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
” (Able v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am
From Meshwerks, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
" The reference to Salford v Mullen is a reference to the cases considered in the current judgment of the Supreme Court. [read post]
