Search for: "House v. Mullen"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 3:01 am
Salford City Council v Mullen: Hounslow London Borough Council v Hall; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby; Manchester City Council v Mushin (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 336; [2010] WLR (D) 91 ”Guidance for county courts hearing applications for possession orders by local authority landlords of non-secure tenancies where the occupier, being an… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
This appeal from the Court of Appeal, where it was known as Salford CC v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, was heard on 23-24 November and concerns the applicability of ECHR, art 8, to mandatory possession proceedings brought by local authorities in two contexts, namely: introductory tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V (Frisby [...] [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
No, according to Meyer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
Mullen was a Nebraska Catholic lawyer who won the tremendously important civil liberties case Meyer v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:46 pm
Defense Secretary Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Mullen will meet with President Obama at the White House at 2:45 p.m. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:07 am
Native American Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:19 pm
Mullen & Gail H. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
Mike Mullen says, the military isn't suited or equipped to do so. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
Mullens cross-appealed on the issue of visitation. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
Although the Supreme Court won’t actually be hearing the appeal in Salford v Mullen in November, it will be hearing the appeals in the cases of Hounslow v Powell, Leeds v Hall and Birmingham v Frisby. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:37 pm
Today’s roundup brings more on Supreme Court case Kiobel v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Oh, and for anyone waiting on tenterhooks for our report on Salford City Council v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336 (AKA the Famous Five), it is coming shortly, honest, but there is a lot to digest and, in the case of Manchester CC, a certain amount of bewilderment as to just what the hell they thought they were doing to get through. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
(Able v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., in which the Court will consider whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
” (Able v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am
From Meshwerks, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
" The reference to Salford v Mullen is a reference to the cases considered in the current judgment of the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
" The reference to Salford v Mullen is a reference to the cases considered in the current judgment of the Supreme Court. [read post]
