Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 201 - 220 of 828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If the 10th seat were filled and a further vacancy occurred, say, during the 4th year of the same presidency, the number of authorized seats would revert to 9. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
A classic statement of this principle is to be found in the decision of the House of Lords in S.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am by Eugene Volokh
{The same criticism applies to the Maine Superior Court’s conclusion that a ban on gun possession in public housing is constitutional. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
’After telephoning S.S., D.S. took her laptop to S.S.'s house to show her the videos. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:53 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689, contending that it owed no duty of care to the plaintiff. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 11:44 am by Giles Peaker
However, as the Renters (Reform) Bill so far effectively reverses the Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v Jepsen (our note) as to liability of superior landlords, the passage of the Bill may make this position more complicated…           The post Upper Tribunal on ‘person managing’ and ‘person in control’ of HMO for an RRO appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
  But first: The Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by Rosalind English
David Thomas Howarth v  Commissioner of Police of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 2818 (QB) – read judgment Protestors have to put up with “sensible and good natured” controls by the authorities as a limitation on their rights to free expression and assembly, the Divisional Court has ruled. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Williams 13-587Issue: Whether the court of appeals exceeded its authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus when it completely disregarded and ignored this Court’s well-established precedent of Woodford v. [read post]