Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 201 - 220 of 827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 3:53 pm by Jennifer Lynch
Dawes, a case in San Francisco Superior Court, this is a general search and violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
It was originally intended to cover “employment, housing, and recreational accommodations and properties”. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm by John Rubin
He stated that the State did not show the efficacy of SBM during PRS and that statute on lifetime SBM could not be construed to authorize SBM for the period of PRS. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm by scottgaille
Express listing of disease, epidemic, pandemic Force majeure, which is French for “superior force,” is generally understood to be an event that is beyond the parties’ reasonable control. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That is, even as Republicans have largely won their decades-long war against labor unions in the private sector (allowing most private companies to quickly drop their pension plans), the public sector is the one remaining stronghold of workers’ power.This issue arose in 2018’s Janus v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
In a preliminary settlement filed in San Mateo Superior Court, the social network agreed to pay damages to American moderators and provide more counseling to them while they work. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am by Kevin
According to the superior court, “[t]he factual framework in this case is nebulous and punctuated by many contradictions. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by Jackie McDermott and Lana Ulrich
French argued that the governing case here is the Supreme Court case Employment Division v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm by Patricia Hughes
His lawsuit raises the constitutional issue of parliamentary immunity, on the basis of which Justice Sally Gomery of the Ontario Superior Court dismissed his claim. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
After being convicted in district court, the defendant appealed for trial de novo in superior court, and the jury found him guilty of the lesser charge of simple assault. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]