Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 976
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
In a recent judgment, the Quebec Superior Court denied a request for an order against a wholesaler/retailer to identify the suppliers of branded products obtained via parallel importation and sold in Quebec without the brand owner’s authorization. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
In a recent judgment, the Quebec Superior Court denied a request for an order against a wholesaler/retailer to identify the suppliers of branded products obtained via parallel importation and sold in Quebec without the brand owner’s authorization. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Hawaii law expressly authorized the Commission to impose this condition. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
See Salamone‑Finchum v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
But the fact that the clashes took place is all the more disturbing because officers were arguably taking orders from illegitimate superiors. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Yet in this particular controversy, involving Trump's accountants and banks, if the high court were to declare the House subpoenas beyond the reach of judges, there would arguably be no way for Trump to prevent his financial institutions from providing his records to House investigators. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:53 am
When the officer went into his house, another nearby officer called the sergeant, who demanded that the officer and his partner return to the station, where four other superior officers were waiting. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
" But the Connecticut Supreme Court in Cotto v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
(G052735; 20 Cal.App.5th 1156; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00605637.) [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Rambling RooftopsWatson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:53 pm
Dawes, a case in San Francisco Superior Court, this is a general search and violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
It was originally intended to cover “employment, housing, and recreational accommodations and properties”. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The federal district court dismissed Dr. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm
He stated that the State did not show the efficacy of SBM during PRS and that statute on lifetime SBM could not be construed to authorize SBM for the period of PRS. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
Express listing of disease, epidemic, pandemic Force majeure, which is French for “superior force,” is generally understood to be an event that is beyond the parties’ reasonable control. [read post]
