Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 281 - 300 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:19 am by Timothy Kim
Superior Court, a controversial California Supreme Court decision that upended the existing legal standards applied in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Austin v Bell Canada, involving a class action around an annual indexing provision of a pension plan, which did largely center around a single comma. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Democrats File Lawsuit to Enforce Subpoena Against McGahn The Hill – Olivia Beavers, Jacqueline Thomsen, and Morgan Chalfant | Published: 8/7/2019 House Judiciary Committee Chairperson Jerrold Nadler filed a civil lawsuit to enforce a subpoena for testimony from Don McGahn, the former White House counsel who at the Trump administration’s direction defied lawmakers’ request to appear before the committee. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by CFM Admin
  Managers should ensure that their supervised persons are not repeating false statements even if those statements were made by a superior. [read post]
But there were 33 prostitutes, 24 alcoholics, 3 epileptics, and 8 who kept houses of ill-fame. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
Supreme Court, in which the plaintiffs contend—and the lower court concluded—that the rationale for the inclusion of the citizenship question provided in the Justice Department letter was pretextual. [read post]