Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court"
Results 301 - 320
of 971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
I generally like the published opinions of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am
In doing so, the Court stated that, `a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
After being convicted in district court, the defendant appealed for trial de novo in superior court, and the jury found him guilty of the lesser charge of simple assault. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Supreme Court issued Roper v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
” The House argues that our decision in Moffitt v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:32 pm
The court also cited Buchwald v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:45 pm
On March 2, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:41 am
Giraldo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:06 am
Norwich orders were introduced in the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
The Supreme Court denied the Bivens claim primarily on a no-entity-liability theory (foreshadowed in the public context by FDIC v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:10 am
I had the Court of Appeal’s decision about capacity to make a homelessness application in mind: WB v W District Council [2018] EWCA Civ 928. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
Labunski (Call #KF4555.L33 2000) which looks at Article V of the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:25 am
Bay Area Citizens v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondents; NMS PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:08 pm
The superior court denied the writ, concluding that the Section 65589.5 findings were not required as project did not meet applicable development standards. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:56 pm
Super Ct. 2000), and it is an unreported superior court decision from Connecticut. [read post]
