Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
See this post on a state superior court decision that they cannot. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
The court ordered that $1,556 of the refund be applied to cure an arrearage in plan payments, $444 be paid to the debtor, and the balance be held by the trustee pending further order of the court. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sanders, the Court turned its attention to the House of Representatives, agreeing with the dissenter on the three-judge district court, who had “relied on Baker v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:43 am by Brandon Harter
That all changed in the January 2019 decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
General Impressions: USPAP, Nichols, and the Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s decisions are the starting point for any constitutional issue. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 5:53 am by Dave
First, some background: The Localism Act 2011 amended the Housing Act 1996, Part 6, to enable local authorities to set out qualification criteria for joining their housing register. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
(We will provide office space, but fellows will need to find their own housing if they are not already local.) [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Charlie Dunlap
” U.S. military law (Rules for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.] 401 (a)—found in the Manual for Courts-Martial) provides that “[a] superior competent authority may withhold the authority of a subordinate to dispose of charges in individual cases, types of case, or generally. [read post]
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]