Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 400 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
I also noted that the Supreme Court has never accepted the “citizen uprising theory” of the Second Amendment. [read post]
AB 1505 restores the authority of cities and counties to require the inclusion of affordable housing in new rental housing projects, thereby superseding the 2009 decision of Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P., et al. v. [read post]
AB 1505 restores the authority of cities and counties to require the inclusion of affordable housing in new rental housing projects, thereby superseding the 2009 decision of Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P., et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also denied the employer’s motion to quash the employee’s subpoena to depose the station’s former in-house counsel, to whom the employee complained of harassment. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
The central revenue feature of Ohio House Bill 66 of 2005 (which was also the biennial budget), the Commercial Activity Tax was designed to phase in as corporation franchise and tangible personal property taxes phased out. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
It is true that Spokeo held that even lawsuits based on statutory violations require proof of a concrete injury and that concreteness is not automatically met by citing a statute that grants a right and authorizes a suit to vindicate that right. 136 S. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Superior Court, which the California Supreme Court decided in 1998. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
The US Supreme Court has spoken directly on this point in Young v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
This post examines a recent decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm by Kirsten Mikadze
In the latest twist in a long-standing saga, the Superior Court of Justice has ruled partially in favour of a landowner upon whose property in Kawartha Lakes an oil spill. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
That is why, for example, even the historically exemption-resistant California Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am by Bob Bauer
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Chagares filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (Trzaska v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:36 am by Rich Vetstein
The borrower challenged the sale in the Superior Court which ruled against her. [read post]