Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 541 - 560 of 973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
The government argues that Munoz is “the superior vehicle” for resolving the issue. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
 Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released the decision in Working Families Ontario v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court): [Plaintiff] alleges [that] … DPH caused the suspension of Alliance's Twitter account. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Almeida-Perez, No. 07-2602, 07-2635 In a prosecution of two brothers for being illegal aliens in possession of firearms that had been transported in interstate commerce, denial of defendants' motion to suppress evidence is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) finding that police reasonably relied on the real or apparent authority of defendants' cousin to consent to police entry of their house; 2) finding that other occupants of their… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Charging the parties with acting more like children, throwing tantrums, teasing and name-calling, Justice Grossman, in his decision in L.T. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm by NL
Sheffield City Council v Oliver LRX/146/2007 meant that the covenant applied by force of statute. b) If that was wrong, as a local housing authority the Council have wide powers to manage their stock as they see fit and it would not be consistent with the existence of these wide powers if individual leaseholders were able to demand that insurance must be provided in a particular manner or with a particular provider. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm by NL
Sheffield City Council v Oliver LRX/146/2007 meant that the covenant applied by force of statute. b) If that was wrong, as a local housing authority the Council have wide powers to manage their stock as they see fit and it would not be consistent with the existence of these wide powers if individual leaseholders were able to demand that insurance must be provided in a particular manner or with a particular provider. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also denied the employer’s motion to quash the employee’s subpoena to depose the station’s former in-house counsel, to whom the employee complained of harassment. [read post]