Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2023, 10:40 am
We shall dismiss the appeal, applying a line of authority, holding that the only review available to appellants is a timely petition for writ of mandate—a line of authority, not incidentally, supported with cases from this Appellate District: In re Pacific Fertility Cases (2022) 78 Cal.App.5th 568, 573, review granted August 17, 2022, S275134, and Housing Group v. [read post]
AB 1505 restores the authority of cities and counties to require the inclusion of affordable housing in new rental housing projects, thereby superseding the 2009 decision of Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P., et al. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:15 am
The Association counters that section 45.031(1), gives the trial court the ultimate authority to order a judicial sale. [read post]
AB 1505 restores the authority of cities and counties to require the inclusion of affordable housing in new rental housing projects, thereby superseding the 2009 decision of Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am by CMS
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:54 am by Jeff Welty
Suppose a superior court judge issues a search warrant authorizing the search of a suspect’s house for drugs. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
 Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:10 am by Iain Rutherford, Brodies LLP
Law The House of Lord decisions in: Clarke v Edinburgh & District Tramways Co Ltd 1919 SC HL 35 and Thomas v Thomas 1947 SC (HL) 45 establish that a trial judge is in a superior position, having seen and heard the witnesses, to form a conclusion as to the credibility and reliability of those witnesses. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
The Demps opinion was authored by Justice Richman, who used to sit on the Alameda County Superior Court and presumably had direct experience applying Biljac. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
(We all assume, as we must given the procedural posture of the case, that he's right; that state law didn't limit the plaintiff to only 12 plants.)Defendants then seek summary judgment on a stupid ground, which both the trial court and the Court of Appeal properly reject. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
See this post on a state superior court decision that they cannot. [read post]