Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:10 am by Iain Rutherford, Brodies LLP
Law The House of Lord decisions in: Clarke v Edinburgh & District Tramways Co Ltd 1919 SC HL 35 and Thomas v Thomas 1947 SC (HL) 45 establish that a trial judge is in a superior position, having seen and heard the witnesses, to form a conclusion as to the credibility and reliability of those witnesses. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
The Demps opinion was authored by Justice Richman, who used to sit on the Alameda County Superior Court and presumably had direct experience applying Biljac. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
See this post on a state superior court decision that they cannot. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
(We all assume, as we must given the procedural posture of the case, that he's right; that state law didn't limit the plaintiff to only 12 plants.)Defendants then seek summary judgment on a stupid ground, which both the trial court and the Court of Appeal properly reject. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Mc Curdy v Shreve-McCurdy, 2011 WL 1457158 (E.D.Mich.) the court granted Brian McCurdy’s petition against Respondent Princess Shreve McCurdy for immediate return of the couple's minor child, B.M., to Canada. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:53 pm by Francis Pileggi
Wilmington Housing Authority, a recent Delaware Supreme Court decision interpreting Section 20 of Article I of the Delaware Constitution. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
 the English House of Lords applied a test that requires that the two works be compared as a whole: The inquiry involves a comparison between two works. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As such, the court ruled that waivers of liability executed by the students precluded their recovery.In the Superior Court case of Hinkal v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:08 am
City of Banning, Case No. 460950 (Riverside County Superior Court, January 29, 2008), petitioners challenged the City of Banning’s approval of a project to develop 1,453 housing units with a school site and other amenities. [read post]