Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2023, 1:49 am
But first: The Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:08 am
They require a landlord to repay an amount of rent paid by a tenant (or pay to a local housing authority an amount of universal credit paid in respect of rent). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
This is the rare hostile environment case does not involve explicitly-racial comments directed toward the plaintiff; rather it involves personnel actions and statements made at Housing Authority meetings.The case is Williams v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
Rakusen v Jepsen and others [2023] UKSC 9, where the Court will determine whether a Rent Repayment Order can only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
In 1969, in Bergman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:54 am
Suppose a superior court judge issues a search warrant authorizing the search of a suspect’s house for drugs. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, on September 24, 1789, Congress authorized the transmission of proposed amendments that would create the Bill of Rights to all thirteen states. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
But it is also an acknowledgment of positional authority. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 10:16 am
In terms of important case law, there is the forthcoming Supreme Court hearing of Rakusen v Jepson in January – the issue being whether a rent repayment order can be made against a superior landlord of the property or only the direct landlord. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am
” Grund v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court applied the House Report’s seemingly broader delineation of exemption 5’s scope to preclude FOIA requesters from gaining access to documents protected by the attorney work product privilege after the relevant litigation had ended. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:03 am
However, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas A. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm
The Marchand decision The first wake-up call after Caremark came with the 2019 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Marchand v. [read post]