Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2023, 1:19 pm
This is for Housing Act 1988 assured tenancies only.) [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Risk-return ESG investing…can be permissible on the same terms as any other kind of active investment strategy that seeks to exploit market mispricing (what we will call active investing) or shareholder control rights (what we will call active shareholding) for profit.[8] Further, in separating these ESG flavors, the authors challenge “common knee-jerk reactions that ESG investing necessarily violates the duty of loyalty. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
For the first time in the Court’s case-law, Macatė v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 10:40 am
We shall dismiss the appeal, applying a line of authority, holding that the only review available to appellants is a timely petition for writ of mandate—a line of authority, not incidentally, supported with cases from this Appellate District: In re Pacific Fertility Cases (2022) 78 Cal.App.5th 568, 573, review granted August 17, 2022, S275134, and Housing Group v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
In National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 3:05 pm
The Los Angeles Superior Court’s decision in the case, Yes In My Back Yard, Sonja Trauss, and Janet Jha v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Office of Personnel Management The Bulk Data for Me but Not for Thee Award: Los Angeles Police Department I Wanted to Clarify That My A** is Covered Award: White House The Transparently Proud of Destroying Public Records Awards: Michael Gableman The Ancient Art of Dodging Accountability Award: Cyber Ninjas The Transparency Tax Award: Mendocino County The Burn After Reading Award: Immigration and Customs Enforcement The MisFIRE in All Directions Award: Irvington Township (I'm Not… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:53 am
In an issue of first impression in Delaware, the Superior Court in Clover Health Investments Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:33 am
Rakusen v Jepsen & Ors (2023) UKSC 9 The issue for the Supreme Court was whether the wording of section 40 and 41 Housing and Planning Act 2016 meant that a rent repayment order could be made against only a tenant’s immediate landlord, or also against a superior landlord (where the occupying tenant’s landlord themselves had a tenancy of the property) where that landlord had also committed a relevant offence. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:49 am
But first: The Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:08 am
They require a landlord to repay an amount of rent paid by a tenant (or pay to a local housing authority an amount of universal credit paid in respect of rent). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
This is the rare hostile environment case does not involve explicitly-racial comments directed toward the plaintiff; rather it involves personnel actions and statements made at Housing Authority meetings.The case is Williams v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
Rakusen v Jepsen and others [2023] UKSC 9, where the Court will determine whether a Rent Repayment Order can only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
In 1969, in Bergman v. [read post]
